We are all Paleisraelistinites
by Jon on Jan.10, 2009, under Babble, Essence, General Philosophy, Politics
I know I give Ron Paul a lot of shit over his backwards approach to social issues — his homophobia, his desire to have the government enforce a Christian interpretation of personhood, and his willingness to coddle and associate with outright racists, whether he be a racist himself or not — but make no mistake, it is to some extent at least because I’m hardest on the ones I love.
Because while he’s no Ghandi, sometimes he’s the closest we’ve got:
As an opponent of all violence, I am appalled by the practice of lobbing homemade rockets into Israel from Gaza. I am only grateful that, because of the primitive nature of these weapons, there have been so few casualties among innocent Israelis. But I am also appalled by the long-standing Israeli blockade of Gaza – a cruel act of war – and the tremendous loss of life that has resulted from the latest Israeli attack that started last month.
There are now an estimated 700 dead Palestinians, most of whom are civilians. Many innocent children are among the dead. While the shooting of rockets into Israel is inexcusable, the violent actions of some people in Gaza does not justify killing Palestinians on this scale. Such collective punishment is immoral. At the very least, the U.S. Congress should not be loudly proclaiming its support for the Israeli government’s actions in Gaza.
Unfortunately, there are no cheap and easy answers to this conflict. There *is* an answer, but it’s a difficult one which will require a revolutionary upheaval in the way that both the left and the right approach our definition of property and our relationships between the individual, the society, and the earth.
It’s tempting to blame religion for this ancient conflict, but that’s giving religion too much credit. Religion is the glue that binds the opposing factions to be sure, and it is the tool their leaders use to motivate action against the enemy — but it is not the why of the fight. As suggested by Malthus, this, like all war, and indeed all politics, is at its core a struggle for control of our natural resources.
In many ways, the struggle between Israel and Palestine could be seen as emblematic of the root bug in our whole damn system. Solve this one — by recognizing that all of the earth belongs to all of the people, that true property can only extend from what one does, not where one stands, and by reorganizing all of our human institutions around these principles — and we solve not just this conflict, but the vast majority of what plagues us the world over.
January 10th, 2009 on 10:08 pm
I agree with the the “root bug” problem & the solution. But, as far as the way things are…Israel has made plenty of mistakes. Yet, they would probably shout from the rooftops with joy & make good neighbors to the Palestinians if only the Palestinian leadership would be willing to recognize Israel’s right to exist. The PLO never did & neither does Hamas… It shocked me how quickly the media showed the horrifying images of the civilian dead and wounded. While back at the ranch, I have found it odd that in nearly 6 years in Iraq, our mainstream media has hardly ever aired the innocent victims, including children, who have lost life and limb in Iraq.
January 10th, 2009 on 10:50 pm
“Let nothing disturb you. Let nothing frighten you. Everything passes away except God. God alone is sufficient.”
April 14th, 2010 on 12:33 pm
What makes you think that Ron Paul is a homophobe? I never heard anyone make that charge before. Ron Paul favors repealing DATD policy, supports gay marriage and had a openly gay staffer/campaign manager on his payroll.
April 14th, 2010 on 1:48 pm
I’ll admit that calling him a homophobe was a bit of overly simplistic hyperbole on my part, and he’s certainly better on gay rights issues than most Republicans, but fair criticisms of his positions by LGBT activists within the libertarian community abound. He supported the DOMA (which, far from being a states rights issue, disallows the federal government from recognizing gay marriages *in those states which have legalized it*), his position on DADT is considered shaky at best, and he generally likes to pretend the 14th Amendment doesn’t exist, when the equal protection clause of that amendment is the primary means by which the individual rights of LGBT Americans are protected from oppressive states.
And if nothing else, by endorsing Chuck Baldwin he clearly showed that any tepid support he may have for gay rights is expendable.
April 14th, 2010 on 3:34 pm
Fair enough.